Now that my blog has almost completely shed its poker origins and therefore about 50% of my readership as well. I have a request for those of you still seeking out my ponderings here. I have heard in the past that my writing at times sacrifices explanatory content for pithy brevity. Recently I have also had some private feedback that my current writing project (book) may be suffering from the same malady. So I ask you:Is the blog too brief?
Am I too blunt, breviloquent, brusque, compendious, concise, preemptory, pithy, short, succinct, summary, tart, terse or unceremonious?
Has this become just a running diary of miscellaneous content drifting towards a miasmic mishmash?
Would you prefer more detail, more bulk, more anything?
Do I leave too much dangling with vague references or the promise of future revelations?
Is the only purpose of life to ask the question: What is the purpose of life?
I have noticed that my readers tend to favor private emails over leaving a public comment. Either or any way you choose to communicate, please do. I am soliciting feedback for the future of Keeping Your Head in All the Games. I am not even vaguely considering abandoning this blog but I may racket it up a notch or simply drift in a different direction. What do you think?
Posts
3 comments:
Are you really contemplating your navel?
It could really be the lint.
It's YOUR blog.
Say what YOU want to say.
No. Blog posts are supposed to be brief. As are comments.
:)
Post a Comment